The editors of Precambrian Research and the team that startled the scientific world in August 1996 with evidence they had found in a Martian meteorite indicating that life once existed on Mars now announce publication of a followup paper [Gibson et al., Precambrian Research 106:15-34 (2001)]. In the 4 years since the publication of that controversial paper [McKay et al., Science 273:924–930], an enormous number of studies have been undertaken to refute or corroborate the hypothesis.
The paper being published in Precambrian Research this month offers new observations of two additional Martian meteorites, evaluates subsequent studies for and against the original lines of evidence, measures evidence for past life on Mars against established criteria for accepting terrestrial samples as fossils, and considers the problem of terrestrial contamination of martian samples-a problem that must be solved before samples are brought from Mars to Earth in 2014. Everett Gibson, senior author of the paper noted, "If the features observed in the two younger Martian meteorites are confirmed to have a biogenic origin, life may have existed on Mars from 3.9 billion years ago to as recently as 165-175 million years ago."
"Life on Mars: evaluation of the evidence within Martian meteorites ALH84001, Nakhla, and Shergotty" is the title of the new paper. The authors of this work, which was funded by NASA's Exobiology Program and Astrobiology Institute, are Everett K. Gibson, Jr., and David S. McKay of NASA's Johnson Space Center; Kathie L. Thomas-Keprta, Susan J. Wentworth, and Mary Sue Bell of Lockheed Martin at JSC; Frances Westall, a National Research Council Fellow at the Lunar & Planetary Institute in Houston; Andrew Steele and Jan Toporski of the University of Portsmouth, England; and Christopher S. Romanek of the Savannah River Ecology Laboratory. Of these, Gibson, McKay, Thomas-Keprta, and Romanek were authors of the original paper on the subject.
The status of the four lines of evidence for life on Mars is summarized as follows.
| Figure 1. | |
(A) ALH84001![]() Click Image For Larger View |
(B) Columbia River Basalt (C) ![]() |
(D)![]() Click Image For Larger View |
(E)![]() |
(F)![]() Click Image For Larger View |
(G)![]() |
| Figure 1. Biogenic-looking features in ALH84001 Martian meteorite (A, D, & F) and similar features in the Columbia River Basalts (B, C, E & G). The features in the Columbia River basalt samples were produced when rock chips were submersed in bacteria-containing well-water from the basalt formations in a culturing laboratory experiment. Identical control experiments using sterilized water did not produce any similar features. The similarity of the ALH84001 features to the Columbia River biogenic features supports our interpretation that the features in ALH84001 were formed by bacteria. |
| Figure 2. | Figure 3. | Figure 4. |
![]() Click Image For Larger View |
![]() Click Image For Larger View |
![]() Click Image For Larger View |
|
Figure 2. Closeup [field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM)] of a triplet structure within the martian meteorite Nakhla with a 20 nanometer wide filament extending from the apex of a terminal sphere. The spheres appear to be partially submerged within biofilm or a later generation of "iddingsite" clay. |
Figure 3. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) image of spheroidal features in the martian meteorite Shergotty with smectite-like clay coatings. These features and spheroidal features observed in Nakhla [Figure 2] are both similar to features in samples cultured from Columbia River Basalt [Figure 4]. |
Figure 4. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) images of spherical features in bacteria-containing samples from Columbia River Basalt. Such features were absent from sterile controls (Thomas-Keprta et al., 1998. Their morphology is similar to that of features in martian meteorites Nakhla [Figure 2] and Shergotty [Figure 3]. |